Location: 727 Oak St. Red Bluff
- 10am – Regular Meeting AGENDA
- 11am – Public Hearing re: REDISTRICTING (see attached)
- 5pm – District 1 Interviews AGENDA
The Board of Supervisors held interviews for the vacant District 1 Supervisor position on Tuesday, October 26th.
This position will be on the ballot in June. I believe several of the candidates are planning to run. If you are in District 1, I strongly recommend you watch the entire interview process to help you make a decision. You will learn a lot about the candidates.
The following applicants were invited to be interviewed:
You can read thier candidates statements here: Agenda Packet
The interview & selection process was awkward but certainly entertaining.
There is no formal process for how a supervisor gets appointed in situations like this. The only rule is that the supervisors must appoint a person within 90 days of the vacancy, if not, the governor appoints one.
None of us – or the supervisors – wanted that.
Ultimately our board agreed to run the position as a PT hire (which is ridiculous) and accept applications. They also allowed the administration (their staff) to select questions to ask during the interview process. The board was not allowed to ask their own questions.
They allowed public comment before the interview – which again, seems ridiculous. How can we comment if we haven’t heard their responses?
Overall, the questions were mostly from a staff perspective (something you’d ask an employee), not a public perspective and not from the supervisors perspective.
The Q&A happened – the supervisors took a “poll” – each writing down their 1st choice:
The vote requires a majority – so 3 votes to pass.
After some debate, which was largely focused on a statement from Mr. King that he had cleared 1 day a week for the job (Candy expressed her concern for that), Supervisor Garton moved to open public comment again.
It really is a FT job, and there were at least 4 other very good candidates.
Seeing they were at a stalemate, they sought direction from counsel, who stated that once they make a motion, they must make a decision or the selection moves to Newsom. She also stated they were allowed to make 3 motions.
So Dennis motioned to appoint Dr. King. Bob 2nd.
After what was a visibly difficult decision, Bob Williams spoke and said King was his #1 choice and he didn’t want to select his #2, but that his #2 would be Moule – so he suggested Candy motion again.
She did – Bob 2nd – chairman Garton directed staff to call the role (in reverse order of the motions) – she called Role to appoint Moule, Dennis, Candy & Bob all voted yes – John voted no. Moule is now District 1 Supervisor.
You can listen to the recorded audio on the county website of watch the whole 4 hour meeting on Liz Merrys Facebook – links below.
When: 10/14 @ 6pm
Where: RB Community Center Auditorium
International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists
Sept 26, 2021: 4,200+ signatures
Doctor and scientists are invited to sign the Global Covid Summit “Declaration” announced in Rome by Dr. Robert Malone:
We the physicians of the world, united and loyal to the Hippocratic Oath, recognizing the profession of medicine as we know it is at a crossroad, are compelled to declare the following;
WHEREAS, it is our utmost responsibility and duty to uphold and restore the dignity, integrity, art and science of medicine;
WHEREAS, there is an unprecedented assault on our ability to care for our patients;
WHEREAS, public policy makers have chosen to force a “one size fits all” treatment strategy, resulting in needless illness and death, rather than upholding fundamental concepts of the individualized, personalized approach to patient care which is proven to be safe and more effective;
WHEREAS, physicians and other health care providers working on the front lines, utilizing their knowledge of epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, are often first to identify new, potentially life saving treatments;
WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients;
WHEREAS, thousands of physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients, as a result of barriers put up by pharmacies, hospitals, and public health agencies, rendering the vast majority of healthcare providers helpless to protect their patients in the face of disease. Physicians are now advising their patients to simply go home (allowing the virus to replicate) and return when their disease worsens, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary patient deaths, due to failure-to-treat;
WHEREAS, this is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS:
RESOLVED, that the physician-patient relationship must be restored. The very heart of medicine is this relationship, which allows physicians to best understand their patients and their illnesses, to formulate treatments that give the best chance for success, while the patient is an active participant in their care.
RESOLVED, that the political intrusion into the practice of medicine and the physician/patient relationship must end. Physicians, and all health care providers, must be free to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, or disciplinary action, including possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations – which further prevent us from caring for patients in need. More than ever, the right and ability to exchange objective scientific findings, which further our understanding of disease, must be protected.
RESOLVED, that physicians must defend their right to prescribe treatment, observing the tenet FIRST, DO NO HARM. Physicians shall not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments. These restrictions continue to cause unnecessary sickness and death. The rights of patients, after being fully informed about the risks and benefits of each option, must be restored to receive those treatments.
RESOLVED, that we invite physicians of the world and all health care providers to join us in this noble cause as we endeavor to restore trust, integrity and professionalism to the practice of medicine.
RESOLVED, that we invite the scientists of the world, who are skilled in biomedical research and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, to insist on their ability to conduct and publish objective, empirical research without fear of reprisal upon their careers, reputations and livelihoods.
The video is navy surgeon Lee Merritt explaining the severity of the shot.
AFFIDAVIT OF LTC. THERESA LONG M.D. IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER
39. The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows:
Arizona’s certified election results:
Keep that number in mind.
When a ballot is rejected by the scanner, a process is in place to duplicate that ballot (essentially someone copies the data directly to a new ballot). There should be 1 DUP (duplicate ballot) for every 1 DSD (damaged sent to duplication).
The table below shows 2,592 more DUPs counted than DSDs.
Last week, one of our Supervisors read a letter by someone who noted that George Washington had required vaccination of military troops in 1777. At the time, 90% of deaths were caused by disease, mostly small pox.
Washington said “Necessity not only authorizes but seems to require the measure, for should the disorder infect the Army . . . we should have more to dread from it, than from the Sword of the Enemy.”
Makes sense doesn’t it? It seem logical that the same thought should apply to our present situation, correct?
I keep hearing people insist that mandatory vaccinations should be required. Those people have not bothered to hear our concerns or offer solutions.
Making snide comments on social media (or in a news column) or yelling at us from your car as you drive by will not bridge the gap.
We are willing to talk. Are you?
Feel encouraged to email firstname.lastname@example.org.
While we wish this resolution included some better information explaining the concerns about shot safety and covid treatment protocols, we appreciate the Board taking a stand against the mandates.
This very misguided post is being circulated on FB. The people posting this are doing so as an insult.
It’s not an insult – it just shows their ignorance.
Instead of trying to insult us – how about taking the time to have a conversation with us about why we believe what we believe and where we actually get the information we have?
PS: If you know me – I’d be happy to talk with you about why I believe what I believe. Chances are, if you shared the conspiracy theory post, you don’t even know what we conspiracy theorists believe.